Comparison
Arkham Intelligence built the most powerful on-chain entity attribution and investigation platform in crypto. OmniRisk is built for the opposite use case — not who owns a wallet, but how risky a token or protocol is right now.
Quick verdict
Arkham is the right choice if you need to identify entities behind wallets, investigate on-chain flows, or participate in the ULTRA intelligence bounty marketplace. OmniRisk is the right choice if you want a composite risk score per token, real-time regime context, and threshold-based alerts for ongoing portfolio risk monitoring.
| Feature | OmniRisk | Arkham Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Composite risk score (0–100) | Yes — OmniScore | No composite score |
| Entity / wallet attribution | Limited | Industry-leading |
| Market regime detection | Yes — built in | No |
| Real-time risk alerts | Yes — threshold-based | No alert system |
| Token-level risk scoring | Yes — 7-signal model | No |
| Investigative analytics | Basic | Deep — ULTRA marketplace |
| Whale wallet tracking | Yes — behavioural signals | Yes — entity labels |
| AI risk narratives | Yes — per token | No |
| Multi-chain coverage | 15+ chains | 10+ chains |
| Free tier | Yes | Limited free access |
Lit dot = stronger on that dimension.
OmniScore aggregates seven signal layers into one interpretable risk number per token. Arkham surfaces raw on-chain data for investigation — it does not produce a risk score.
OmniRisk is purpose-built for ongoing risk monitoring with threshold-based alerts. Arkham is an investigative tool — you go to it when something has already happened, not to be alerted before it does.
OmniRisk layers macro risk-on / risk-off context across every score and alert. Arkham has no equivalent regime signal.
OmniRisk scores every token on 7 independent signals. Arkham analyses wallet flows and entity attribution — not token-level contract or liquidity risk.
Arkham's labelled-entity database and ULTRA bounty marketplace are unmatched. If you need to identify who controls a wallet — VC, exchange, known attacker — Arkham is the definitive tool.
Arkham is built for forensic investigation — tracing fund flows, identifying connected wallets, and mapping on-chain relationships. OmniRisk is built for forward-looking risk scoring, not historical investigation.
Arkham Intelligence specialises in on-chain entity attribution — identifying who controls a wallet, tracing fund flows, and mapping relationships via its ULTRA intelligence marketplace. OmniRisk focuses on composite risk scoring — aggregating seven signal layers into one interpretable risk number per token, updated in near-real time, with regime context and threshold alerts.
No. OmniRisk does not maintain a named-entity database comparable to Arkham's. OmniRisk tracks large wallet behaviour and accumulation patterns as a risk signal, but it does not attribute wallets to named entities or organisations.
OmniRisk is built specifically for proactive risk monitoring — composite scores, regime context, and alerts before problems escalate. Arkham is an investigative tool designed for understanding what happened after the fact. For ongoing portfolio risk management, OmniRisk is the more purpose-built choice.
Yes — they serve complementary purposes. Use OmniRisk for day-to-day composite risk scoring, regime alerts, and token-level monitoring. Use Arkham when you need to investigate a specific wallet, trace suspicious fund flows, or identify the entity behind an address of interest.
OmniScore, regime detection, and real-time threshold alerts. Free to start.